In vitro fertilization
 Search     for          [ Advanced Search ]


    Browse   Add Article/Listing   What's Top   What's New   Featured   Tell a Friend   FAQ



  Categories

    News (917)
    Jobs & Resumes (52)
    Image Database (205)
    IVF Mail (614)
    Reviews (64)
    Links (97)
    Books & Videos (49)
    Clinics (215)
    Embryology courses (32)
    Tutorials (8)
    Writers (4)


  Sponsors

1.  ac-tive (IVF)
2.  CRi (Oosight)
3.  Cryolock
4.  Hamilton Thorne Research
5.  IVFonline
6.  MediCult
7.  Mellowood Medical Clinic Software
8.  Research Instruments
9.  Vitrolife
10.  Zander IVF


  Featured Listings


SynVitro Hyadase



Biopsy Medium



  Online Now

Welcome, guest !
We have 0 members
and 42 guests online


  Recently Viewed

1.  Some UK health trusts refusing to fund IVF
2.  No physical health problems for ICSI children
3.  Frozen embryos kept while surrogate sought
4.  Reproductive Laboratory Science - University of Kentucky, USA
5.  Human Implantation: The New Frontiers of Human Assisted Reproductive Technologies
6.  Serum Biomedical Institute
7.  Parliament supports children's right to know of donor conception
8.  Early announcement course in Argentina
9.  CLINICAL EMBRYOLOGY AND ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY
10.  UK couple to test embryos for hereditary breast cancer


  IVF Support

1.  Resolve
2.  Infertility Network UK
3.  American Infertility Association
4.  Fertile Hope
5.  Egg Freezing
6.  Fertility Connect
7.  e-Infertility Network
8.  INCIID
9.  NISIG – Ireland


  IVF Tutorials

 
IVF


IVF > News

Some UK health trusts refusing to fund IVF

Dr. Kirsty Horsey
Progress Educational Trust
23 July 2005
Discuss this article Read comments Add to favorites

[BioNews, London] Despite government promises to end the 'postcode lottery' of the provision of fertility treatment in the UK, ten primary care trusts (PCTs) of the UK's National Health Service (NHS) have said they will refuse to fund IVF treatments at present.



The ten PCTs, all in the county of Hampshire, said that they had limited funding and that IVF has to be a 'low priority'. The decision was taken after a series of group meetings, after which the PCTs were left to make their own individual decisions based on other guidance and legal advice. A spokeswoman for two of the PCTs said that treatment would be offered as and where funds actually became available, adding that 'the decision was not taken lightly and was absolutely necessary to ensure we have sufficient funds to invest in other important areas of care'. Funding will continue for those couples who have already started their treatment in the county.



In February 2004, the then health secretary, Sir John Reid, announced that all infertile couples fitting certain criteria should be given one free cycle of IVF on the NHS from April 2005, with a view to increasing provision further. Prior to his announcement, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) had issued guidelines stating that three cycles of IVF should be offered to all infertile couples.



Fertility campaigners say they are 'dismayed' by the PCTs' decision. Clare Brown, chair of the National Infertility Awareness Campaign (NIAC), said that many infertile couples would be 'let down' by the Hampshire PCTs' announcement. She said that couples had been given 'some hope' by the government's 2004 announcement, and said that NIAC 'would urge the PCTs to reassess their decision as a matter of urgency and allow patients access to the treatment they deserve'. She added: 'I would urge the government to act now to reassure patients across the country that they will not be denied access to the treatments they have been promised'.



http://www.BioNews.org.uk
BioNews@progress.org.uk
© Copyright 2008 Progress Educational Trust

Reproduced from BioNews with permission, a web- and email-based source of news, information and comment on assisted reproduction and human genetics, published by Progress Educational Trust.


Page Views: 1548

 

Average Visitor Rating:    4.50 (out of 5)
Number of Ratings: 2 Votes
Rate This Article:
 Visitor comments (1)
Discuss this article Write a comment

I think it is a disgrace how they get to pick who has children and who does not how can they people have the right.as my husband and i were refused NHS funding because he has children to an other women. i feel very hurt that some one sitting in an office can decide my future .As it is me who has problems not him how can they come to that .every body who needs help and has no children should get it free.
01 September 2005 - elaine hastie







  IVF Jobs



IVF Jobs | Resumes

Click here to post your
job announcement



  Latest Listings

1.  HANDS-ON TRAINING ON INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION & MOLECULAR GENETICS
2.  Obesity and diabetes may be linked with male infertility
3.  Study casts doubt over the use of acupuncture to improve IVF success rates
4.  Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill: postponed
5.  New study shows frozen embryos better than fresh for IVF


  Featured



  IVF Newsletter

Subscribe for the latest IVF news and announcements.
name
email
add   remove  


  Most Popular

1.  IVF success rates from US show age is all important
2.  IVF twins in demand
3.  Embryo quality and grading: The good, the bad or the ugly?
4.  Romanian woman set to become world's oldest mother
5.  First egg bank to open in the UK


  Talk to us



Name:  

E-mail:  



  IVF Videos

1.  Lysed Cell Removal
2.  Embryonic Division
3.  Professor Robert Edwards



Search Listings | Place Listings | Edit Listings | My Profile | My Favorites | Auto Notify | Sitemap | FAQ |
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Tell Your Friends | Refund Policy | ROR/RSS | Sponsorship and Advertising


embryo
Copyright © 1997-2008, IVF.net. All Rights Reserved.