In vitro fertilization
 Search     for          [ Advanced Search ]


    Browse   Add Article/Listing   What's Top   What's New   Featured   Tell a Friend   FAQ



  Categories

    News (952)
    Jobs & Resumes (58)
    Image Database (205)
    IVF Mail (641)
    Reviews (64)
    Links (100)
    Books & Videos (49)
    Clinics (220)
    Embryology courses (35)
    Tutorials (8)


  Sponsors

1.  ac-tive (IVF)
2.  CRi (Oosight)
3.  Cryolock
4.  Hamilton Thorne Research
5.  IVFonline
6.  MediCult
7.  Mellowood Medical Clinic Software
8.  Research Instruments
9.  Vitrolife
10.  Zander IVF


  Featured Listings


Biopsy Medium



SynVitro Flush



  Online Now

Welcome, guest !
We have 0 members
and 55 guests online


  Recently Viewed

1.  US study suggests little demand for social sex selection
2.  'Egg-sharing' for research given go ahead in UK
3.  HFEA under fire for involvment in 'trial by TV''
4.  Blastocyst
5.  Surrogate mother loses court battle to keep child
6.  ##f_title##
7.  NIH sponsored research on oocyte quality
8.  Training in IVF and Embryology
9.  ICSI
10.  California restricts egg donor payments


  IVF Support

1.  Resolve
2.  Infertility Network UK
3.  American Infertility Association
4.  Fertile Hope
5.  Egg Freezing
6.  Fertility Connect
7.  e-Infertility Network
8.  INCIID
9.  NISIG – Ireland


  IVF Tutorials

 
IVF


IVF > News

US study suggests little demand for social sex selection

Dr. Kirsty Horsey
Progress Educational Trust
20 February 2006
Discuss this article Read comments Add to favorites

[BioNews, London] A new study carried out at the University of Illinois in Chicago shows that most people would not choose the sex of their baby, if given the option. The findings, published in the journal Fertility and Sterility, are based on an online survey of 1,197 men and women aged between 18 and 45. Just eight per cent of the participants said they would opt for sex selection using currently available 'sperm sorting' technology, a figure that rose to 18 per cent if it were possible to determine gender simply by taking a pill. Study leader Tarun Jain said the results should 'ease the fears' of those who believe sex selection will become widespread when it is readily available in the US.

Sex selection for non-medical reasons is controversial in the US and elsewhere. Both the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists oppose its use. However, the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) has said that it supports sex selection for family balancing reasons, provided the methods used are proved to be safe and effective. In the UK, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) ruled in 2003 that parents should not be allowed to choose the sex of their babies.

The sperm sorting technique, developed in 2001, exploits the fact that the chromosome that determines a baby's sex comes from the sperm. Whether a sperm carries an X (female) or Y (male) chromosome affects the amount of DNA it contains, so 'male' and 'female' sperm can be separated on this basis. Microsort, the company that markets the technology, claims that its success rate is 91 per cent for girls, and 76 per cent for baby boys. Patients are required to undergo between three to five cycles of intrauterine insemination, at an average cost of $2,500 (about ?1440) per attempt. Only eight per cent of survey respondents said they would opt to use the technique - a figure that rose to 12 per cent if it could be done in only one treatment cycle, and if it were covered by health insurance.

Overall, 77 per cent of respondents who wanted more than one child either said they preferred an equal number of boys and girls, or they had no preference as to the sex of their children. Dr Jain said the findings suggested that 'people still want to leave things up to chance and not rely on science for everything'. The results are in contrast to an earlier study by the group, in which a survey of 561 American women undergoing treatment for infertility showed that 41 per cent would choose the sex of their baby, if sex selection was offered at no additional cost. Jain said the different findings of the two studies were significant, but not surprising. He pointed out that infertile couples may feel they have only one chance to have a child, while the general population assumes the opportunity for more children.



http://www.BioNews.org.uk
BioNews@progress.org.uk
© Copyright 2008 Progress Educational Trust

Reproduced from BioNews with permission, a web- and email-based source of news, information and comment on assisted reproduction and human genetics, published by Progress Educational Trust.


Page Views: 1369

 

Average Visitor Rating:    5.00 (out of 5)
Number of Ratings: 2 Votes
Rate This Article:
 Visitor comments (0)
Discuss this article Write a comment

(No comments found. You may write the first one!)





  IVF Jobs



IVF Jobs | Resumes

Click here to post your
job announcement



  Latest Listings

1.  University of Oxford's new MSc in Clinical Embryology now recruiting for October 2009 entry
2.  Scientists find new information about embryo implantation
3.  India to introduce new fertility regulation
4.  Obesity may affect sex hormone levels but not sperm count
5.  Research or sale? US IVF patients are asked what to do with 'spare embryos'
6.  Acupuncture aids IVF success
7.  Anti-depressants may be linked to male infertility


  Featured



  IVF Newsletter

Subscribe for the latest IVF news and announcements.
name
email
add   remove  


  Most Popular

1.  IVF success rates from US show age is all important
2.  IVF twins in demand
3.  Embryo quality and grading: The good, the bad or the ugly?
4.  Romanian woman set to become world's oldest mother
5.  First egg bank to open in the UK
6.  A New Option-In Vitro Maturation of Human Oocytes IVM??
7.  IVF and ICSI children grow up healthy


  Talk to us



Name:  

E-mail:  



  IVF Videos

1.  Lysed Cell Removal
2.  Embryonic Division
3.  Professor Robert Edwards
4.  Embryo Metabolomics



Search Listings | Place Listings | Edit Listings | My Profile | My Favorites | Auto Notify | Sitemap | FAQ |
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Tell Your Friends | Refund Policy | ROR/RSS | Sponsorship and Advertising


embryo
Copyright © 1997-2008, IVF.net. All Rights Reserved.